For sometime, there have been reports in the media that Reliance Jio will start offering 4G-enabled feature phones in the country. Apparently, there will be two models priced between Rs 999 and Rs 1,499. Both feature phones will come loaded with Jio’s services. It is said Reliance will target the rural and tier-III markets, and thus it plans to offer affordable, 4G feature phones. These are not to be confused with 4G smartphones.

Even if Reliance Jio’s upcoming feature phones are 4G-ready and run its own services, they will not be able to match a basic smartphone powered by Google’s Android OS. Let’s be clear: a feature phone is no substitute for a smartphone; the latter lets you browse the internet on a large screen, watch videos and movies, run apps and games and takes care of all your selfies, which a feature phone can’t do.

Also read: Do we really need a 4G phone for Rs 1500, but can’t offer a good experience? Naah

Reliance’s idea is to make an advanced feature phone, and get that feature phone subscriber base. After all Jio’s network is only 4G VoLTE in India, and thus it is targeting that segment who are still on feature phones.

But in the past, several companies have tried to sell budget phones with limited features and capabilities in India. Most of them have failed terribly at it. The“value for money” option is something that hasn’t always convinced buyers, despite the large number of feature phone users in India. Remember Firefox OS, the Nokia Asha series? Here’s a look some of the biggest budget phone ideas, which failed in the Indian market.

Firefox OS

It was in 2014 when Intex first launched a smartphone powered by Firefox OS. At Rs 1,999, the phone was comfortably within the budget of millions, and yet it failed badly. Soon, Spice, Alcatel OneTouch and Zen Mobiles launched smartphones powered by Mozilla’s Mozilla Operating system (OS). The phones were specially targeted at the affordable segment and first-time smartphone buyers.
Reliance Jio, Reliance Jio 4G feature phones, Firefox OS, Samsung Tizen, Android One, Nokia Asha, Nokia phones, smartphones, Android, technology, technology news Firefox’s Mozilla OS was a failed attempt to tap the low-end smartphone market.

In December 2015, Mozilla gave up the development of the OS. There are several reasons why a Web-based OS failed to make any mark on the Indian smartphone market. The phones made by Intex and other manufacturers were sold with dated hardware specifications. Plus there was no clear differentiating factor, which made these devices stand out in the crowded feature phone market.

Nokia Asha

Nokia was once the leader in the mobile phone market, with company dominating in the Indian market. Still, Nokia failed to make any significant progress with the Asha range. A number of phones were launched under the Asha lineup targeted at the entry-level market.
Reliance Jio, Reliance Jio 4G feature phones, Firefox OS, Samsung Tizen, Android One, Nokia Asha, Nokia phones, smartphones, Android, technology, technology news The Asha range was pitched as an alternative to Google’s Android OS.

In 2013, Nokia made a revamp of the Asha platform in an attempt to push its low-end phones with internet capabilities in a market like India. The Asha 500, 502 and 503 were pitched as alternatives to Android-powered phones in terms of capabilities and even featured application support. Although the platform had apps, the quality and functionality was not par with smartphones powered by Android.

Samsung Tizen

Even though Samsung is the leader in India’s smartphone marker, its own operating system has received a cold response from consumers. The company’s own Tizen OS has struggled to prove an alternative to Google’s Android.
Reliance Jio, Reliance Jio 4G feature phones, Firefox OS, Samsung Tizen, Android One, Nokia Asha, Nokia phones, smartphones, Android, technology, technology news Samsung’s Tizen OS has struggled to prove an alternative to Google’s Android.

Samsung has not been able to convince developers to make apps for the platform. The South Korean technology giant is selling Tizen-powered smartphones in a few markets, with a major focus on India and Bangladesh. But the future of Tizen OS on smartphones is still unknown.

Android One

Google’s intention behind the Android One program was to target the entry-level consumers in the Indian market. For this project, Google had partnered with three top-ranked regional handset players namely Micromax, Karbonn and Spice in 2014.
Reliance Jio, Reliance Jio 4G feature phones, Firefox OS, Samsung Tizen, Android One, Nokia Asha, Nokia phones, smartphones, Android, technology, technology news Google’s very own Android OS program was unable to create any mark in the affordable segment.

The plan was that Google would provide a hardware reference design to handset makers and also control over-the-air software updates. The Android One phones offered a bloatware-free software experience at budget pricing. But, despite spending millions of dollars on ad campaigns, the Android One program was a big failure. Many assume it failed to take off due to the specifications of the smartphones, which didn’t match up to what the competition was offering.

The Mozilla Foundation has attempted to fan out various circumstances over the previous decade, with differing levels of progress. One zone where it truly didn’t work out quite as well as it trusted however, was in the formation of Firefox OS controlled Mozilla cell phones. Not as much as a year on from stopping the equipment behind it, inside Firefox OS improvement has now been formally shut down as well.

Initially flaunted in 2012, Firefox OS increased some genuine footing over the next years, in the end winding up in brilliant TVs, cell phones and tablets from various makers. It joined the Firefox program rendering motor with a Linux Kernel in a one of a kind blend that from every angle worked rather well.


However in spite of its development, by the end of 2015 Mozilla declared that it would never again be offering cell phones that utilized the working framework and now here we are 10 months after the fact and the Foundation is stopping all improvement. It said however that any outsiders which wish to proceed with advancement, for example, Panasonic with its Firefox OS empowered TVs, may keep on doing so (according to PCPer).

The last arrival of the OS will be rendition 2.6.

This is very disillusioning news for not just organizations that put time and exertion into supporting the stage, yet customers with gadgets which will never again be redesigned. Those running Firefox cell phones, or associated gadgets which run the OS, may get themselves helpless against security issues later on with an absence of redesigns.

Still, the Mozilla Foundation needs to consider its future and it can’t bear to put time and subsidizes into tasks which don’t offer a decent degree of profitability.

Goodbye Firefox OS cell phones. Mozilla today declared a conclusion to its cell phone explore, and said that it would quit creating and offering Firefox OS cell phones. It will keep on experimenting on how it may take a shot at other associated gadgets and Internet of Things systems.

The declaration was made before today at Mozilla’s engineer occasion in Orlando, “Mozlando”, and a few people were tweeting the rudiments of the news. Presently Mozilla has given us a full proclamation from Ari Jaaksi, Mozilla’s SVP of Connected Devices.

“We are glad for the advantages Firefox OS added to the Web stage and will keep on experimenting with the client encounter crosswise over associated gadgets. We will fabricate all that we do as a veritable open source extend, concentrated on client encounter first and construct apparatuses to empower the biological community to develop.

Firefox OS demonstrated the adaptability of the Web, scaling from low-end cell phones as far as possible up to HD TVs. Notwithstanding, we couldn’t offer the most ideal client experience thus we will quit offering Firefox OS cell phones through transporter channels.

We’ll share more on our work and new trials crosswise over associated gadgets soon.”

Firefox OS was initially uncovered in 2013, with the point of focusing on the creating scene and late adopters with ease handsets.

To separate from Android and iOS, Mozilla and its bearer accomplices concentrated on a web-first stage, with no local and just web applications. Deals, be that as it may, were constantly poor and the gadgets themselves neglected to touch off a ton of customer premium, and various OEMs cornered the market with a surge of shabby handsets. In a business that relies on upon economies of scale, it was a disappointment.

Mozilla has been on a streamlining track of late. A week ago it reported that it would search for option homes for its Thunderbird email and talk customer. The point is for the organization to concentrate more on its most grounded and center items and notoriety. Today the organization likewise divulged another advertisement blocker, playing on its current way to deal with security and position on client following and treats.

Mozilla has another logo, the most recent in the organization’s push to rebrand itself as a present day innovation furnish deserving of your consideration. It’s nothing unexpected that the organization coming to remain important notwithstanding diving utilization of its key item, the web program Firefox. In the distance is a planner who still uses Adobe Pagemaker and is exceptionally pleased with their work on this logo. Whatever is left of us are pondering where the hellfire the Mozilla we used to know has gone.

Just a logo architect around 1997 would have thought this new brandmark was a smart thought. In those days web construct organizations all demanded with respect to including or suggesting their URL in the logo and name. “Since it has a part of URL installed amidst the logo, you know this must be some sort of web organization,” Tim Murray, Mozilla’s inventive executive, told Wired in an article posted today, in 2017.

Yes, Tim. That was a decent arrangement a quarter century when a great many people thought the web was only a connection past AOL’s appreciated screen. In any case, we live in 2017 Tim, and as opposed to sounding or looking cool, Mozilla just shows up agonizingly distant.

The logo wouldn’t be so bumping aside from that it underscores exactly how severely Mozilla has been battling as of late as it tries to recover its radiance days. In the course of the last half decade it’s wavered, with Firefox losing urgent introduces to Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge. Mozilla was compelled to chop out its enormous open source email program, Thunderbird, in 2012. What’s more, how about we not overlook the significant slip that was Firefox OS, Mozilla’s endeavor at rivaling Android and iOS.

As far as it matters for its, the organization has had some late wins. Like when it naturally blocked Flash to shield clients from shocking security imperfections, or when it propelled Focus for iOS, an incredible super-private program.

Be that as it may, the wins are minor, and they have never been sufficient to pull Mozilla, or Firefox, out of the spiral it’s wound up in. Which is a disgrace. Firefox was before the most imaginative program on the planet. It was quicker and more secure than Safari or Internet Explorer, and it offered what were, at the time, unique devices like tabs, promotion blocking, and even additional items. Wowie!

In any case, then Google tagged along and offered the greater part of that in a considerably quicker and more alluring bundle. It brought the cloud along as well—giving clients access to the majority of their bookmarks, passwords, and much program history, crosswise over gadgets. Firefox presented its own particular cloud segment, however by then it was past the point of no return, Chrome had overwhelmed it and, as of March 2016, outperformed Internet Explorer too.

Information and graph from Netmarketshare.

An unpleasant new logo that appears as though it was cobbled together by a l337 13-year old programmer during a time when Spice Girls still bested the diagrams wouldn’t settle that harm. Rather, it’s meaningful of the organization’s disappointments as opposed to proclaiming its phoenix-like recovery. Firefox has wavered on the grounds that it’s ended up bloated, terrible, and moderate. This is programming that needs to be pervasive yet took almost ten years to make a 64-bit variation for Windows.

Also, it’s a damn disgrace. The most famous programs track your each development on the web, precisely fabricating a correct picture of your online exercises, while additionally putting away the majority of your passwords and usernames. Those programs are likewise made by three of the biggest organizations on the planet, Google, Apple, and Microsoft.

So a rapid, well known option with a lot of outsider support and a pledge to the open source show, which democratizes programming improvement, is truly damn engaging. It’s what Firefox used to be before it fell behind. How about we trust Mozilla moves back in that bearing, and not towards wherever the damnation some tastefully tested architect thought the organization was going.